Loading the player...

Atezolizumab Does Not Improve Pathologic Complete Response Rates in HER2+ Early Breast Cancer

Results published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology from a phase-3 trial have shed light on the efficacy of atezolizumab plus neoadjuvant dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide-paclitaxel and pertuzumab-trastuzumab in patients with high-risk, HER2-positive early breast cancer. 

This novel combination did not increase pathologic complete response rates relative to those treated with placebo in either the intention-to-treat population or among patients positive for PD-L1. The study concluded that pertuzumab-trastuzumab plus chemotherapy remains the standard of care in this patient population.  
 
The double-blind and placebo-controlled IMpassion050 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant atezolizumab/placebo in combination with pertuzumab-trastuzumab and chemotherapy in patients with high risk, HER2-positive early breast cancer. This study is the first to report the safety and efficacy of cancer immunotherapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer. 

A total of 454 patients were enrolled, all of whom had a primary tumor > 2 cm and histologically confirmed, positive lymph node status. (T2-4, N1-3, M0).  

Following surgery, the participants all continued with atezolizumab/placebo plus pertuzumab-trastuzumab, for a total of 1 year of HER2-targeted therapy; those with residual disease could switch to ado-trastuzumab emtansine with atezolizumab/placebo.  

Pathologic complete response rates in the intention-to-treat population were 62.7% among patients treated with placebo (143/228), compared with 62.4% for those in the atezolizumab group (141/226; P = .9551). Similarly, pathologic complete response rates among individuals with PD-L1-positive tumors were 72.5% (79/109) in placebo patients and 64.2% (70/109) in atezolizumab patients (P = .1846).  

These findings proved consistent across a series of subgroups in both the intention-to-treat and PD-L1-positive populations, including age, race, tumor/nodal staging, and biomarkers (including central HER2, hormone receptor, and PIK3CA mutational status).  
 
On the other hand, pathologic complete response rates were greater in patients with PD-L1-negative tumors treated with atezolizumab than in their counterparts treated with placebo (60.7% vs 53.8%). 

Analyses of safety and tolerability found that grade 3/4 and serious adverse events were more frequent in the atezolizumab group than they were among patients in the placebo group. Moreover, all five grade-5 adverse events observed in the study occurred in atezolizumab patients.  
 
“[Pathologic complete response] rates with [pertuzumab-trastuzumab] and chemotherapy were high and in accordance with study expectations; however, addition of atezolizumab did not increase [pathologic complete response] rates versus placebo in the [intention-to-treat] or PD-L1-positive populations,” primary author Jens Huober, MD, of Canton Hospital and the Breast Center St. Gallen, Switzerland, and colleagues wrote. 

“Current neoadjuvant [standard of care] for HER2-positive early breast cancer ([pertuzumab-trastuzumab] and chemotherapy) remains valid; further data are needed to clarify the role of cancer immunotherapy in this setting,”  
- Huober and colleagues concluded 

-- 
References: 
https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.21.02772?bid=183384593&cid=DM10951 
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03726879 

Disclosures: Authors declared financial ties to drugmakers. See full study for details. IMpassion050 is being funded by Roche. 

Photo Credit: Getty Images.  

By Michael Vlessides, MD /alert Contributor 

Next Up In Breast Cancer

SABCS 2023 Annual Meeting

MD /Alert Exclusives

Featured Breast Cancer Videos

Breaking Research

ASCO 2023 Annual Meeting

Curated For You

SABCS 2022 Annual Meeting

ASCO 2022 Annual Meeting

SABCS 2020 Annual Meeting

ASCO 2020 Annual Meeting